“Let him who possesses a field, so
partake of its yearly fruits, that he may not suffer the ground to be injured
by his negligence, but let him endeavour to hand it down to posterity as he
received it, or even better cultivated.” John Calvin, 1554
News
Today China announced that 2012 delivered the slowest annual
growth for China since 1999 – at a ‘mere’ 7.8%.
At the same time people in Beijing and other northern cities have been
languishing under record levels of air pollution in the last week.
The new leadership taking over the world’s second largest
economy in March will certainly have their minds focused on keeping the economy
growing, as this has propelled China to unprecedented influence on the world
stage in recent decades. But at what
price?
It is generally accepted that environmental damage is an
unavoidable consequence of rapid industrialisation and the transition from a low
income to a middle income economy. When
a country is more wealthy it can afford cleaner vehicles, factories and power
stations, it is argued. But can China afford
not to curb its emissions now?
This is not just an economic dilemma, it is a relational one
also, in three respects. There’s the
relationship between those who use and those who abuse the environment. Everyone benefits from a clean, healthy
environment, but only a few people – both in industry and government – take the
decisions about what levels of pollution are acceptable, which in China’s case
seem woefully high.
Secondly, the relationship between those who gain the most
from economic growth – the highest earners who can afford air conditioning in
their homes and cars – and those who benefit a little, migrant workers in poor
housing, or the elderly and sick, who are more likely to suffer respiratory and
other illnesses owing to pollution.
Lastly the relationship between the generations: even if one
generation agrees that environmental damage is an acceptable price for
maximising growth, the generations that follow have no say in that decision,
and will be obliged to pay for the accumulated debts and diminished potential
of the land, rivers and air. Is it right
for the children to pay for their fathers’ environmental sins?
Read on…
For a good introduction to the Christian perspective on the
environment, read the Cambridge Paper “A burning issue” by Dr Bob White here.
Walk the talk
You may not be responsible for the pollution around where
you live, but that doesn’t stop you from taking an initiative to clear some of
it up; why not organise a litter picking afternoon with some other families or
friends?
The last word
From the Bible, Psalm 104, verses 10-12: “[God] makes springs
pour water into the ravines; it flows between the mountains. They give water to
all the beasts of the field; the wild donkeys quench their thirst. The birds of
the air nest by the waters; they sing among the branches.”
As China experiences economic growth, it also suffers from a fast deteriorating environmental condition. Industrialization has brought tremendous pressure on the Chinese environment. Air pollution is one of the major issues that the government is trying to resolve and so far, they have failed in their efforts to do so.
ReplyDeleteSabrina Garza