Friday 21 December 2012

A Nativity invitation

This Friday Five is to wish you all a very Happy Christmas – or ‘Festive Season’ if you don’t celebrate the Christian festival.  Unfortunately in the western world, Christmas has become so commercialised that it barely makes any connection with the event which lies behind it.  To discover another perspective, let’s turn the clock back to 1644 and a painting by the French baroque artist Georges de La Tour, called ‘Nativity – Adoration of the Shepherds’.


 
In the biblical story, the shepherds were the first people to learn about the birth of Jesus, from an angel who said, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people.  Today in the town of David a Saviour has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord.”
 
De La Tour sees the shepherds as symbolic of ordinary people – in contrast to the wealthy, influential Magi who would later come and worship the child.  In fact only one of the characters gathered next to the prayerful, watchful Mary is obviously a shepherd, with a lamb and his staff in his hand.  Next to him is a more shadowy figure, holding a musical instrument, then a woman carrying a pot with a lid on it – perhaps with some hot soup for the family.  Lastly an old man, who holds the candle and shields it from any draught which might blow it out.
 
The artist seems to understand that people from all walks of life can come to Christ, to know and be known as they are – bringing what they have in their hands.  The shepherd came with the tools of his trade, the musician brought his talent, the woman her hospitality, and the old man his wisdom and experience.
 
What is in your hands?  Whether it’s your professional skill, your creative talent, your daily service to your family, or your age and experience – bring it all, says De La Tour, to this ordinary yet glorious child whose coming bridged the unfathomable distance between heaven and earth. 

Friday 14 December 2012

Humour and its relational consequences



Quote
‘Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not; a sense of humour to console him for what he is.’  Francis Bacon

News
The tragic death of nurse Jacintha Saldanha, three days after the hoax phone call by two Australian DJs to the hospital where the Duchess of Cambridge was being treated for morning sickness, has led to some serious soul-searching.

It is not yet known the degree to which the hoax call drove Mrs Saldanha to suicide, but it was almost certainly a contributing factor.  Hoaxes have been part of radio broadcasting for decades, but their humour relies on the victim coming to realise it’s a joke and calling the perpetrator’s bluff.  When that fails to happen, what began as a prank may become a more serious deception.

Humour is culturally determined, so when two DJs from Australia phone a hospital in London and speak to an Indian nurse, there’s a big risk that the funny side will be lost.  However, the radio station’s decision to broadcast the conversation was probably not based on the (failed) humour but on the media scoop of having got so close to the Duchess of Cambridge – despite the obvious breach of patient confidentiality involved.

But the damage has been done, and in this tragic case it’s irreversible.  What should happen to repair the harm done?  A problem like this is not ultimately going to be solved by financial means (e.g. the radio station putting its advertising profits into a memorial fund), nor by legal measures (e.g. regulators reviewing the station’s broadcasting license or their compliance with the law).

Although these steps are of some value, at the end of the day relationships of respect and then reconciliation can be neither bought nor legislated.  They will come from greater relational thinking and awareness, and might lead to more relationally careful broadcasting.

And when things do go seriously wrong between people or groups, the response which is essential to begin the process of restoration and healing is the simple relational one from the heart: saying sorry.

Read on…
Humour is an essential part of life, but as we’ve seen, is not without risks.  For a Christian perspective on this, you can read James and Kate Williams’ Cambridge Paper on humour, scripture and Christian discourse here.

Walk the talk
Relationally responsible humour does not exclude poking fun at others, provided it’s done with sensitivity and you can also laugh at yourself; how are you doing on that count?

The last word
From the Bible, Numbers 22, verse 30: ‘But in response, the donkey asked Balaam, "I'm your donkey that you've ridden on in the past without incident, am I not, and I'm the same donkey you're riding on right now, am I not? Am I in the habit of treating you like this?"  "No," he admitted.’

Friday 7 December 2012

Taxing questions



Quote
“The government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases:  If it moves, tax it.  If it keeps moving, regulate it.  And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”  Ronald Reagan

News
Weeks of negative media exposure about the failure of Starbucks to pay UK corporation tax for years has brought about a U-turn in the company.  What the Starbucks board had perhaps considered an accounting success – posting a notional loss on their £400 million turnover in UK– has become a scandalous liability.

British toleration of tax avoidance is wearing thin, especially as the prospect of five more years of austerity is affecting millions of people, by squeezing incomes and heaping pressure on family relationships.  Increased tax revenues are in everyone’s interest, especially the poor who rely on welfare.

As the law currently stands, multinational companies can effectively choose how much corporation tax to pay in a jurisdiction, without acting illegally; it illustrates the glaring discrepancy between the letter and the spirit of the law. 

The anger generated over this underscores the reality that laws are intrinsically relational, since they act to establish or protect certain relational ideals.  Breaking the law involves an offender and a victim, and damages the relationship between the two parties; so tax avoidance is more than just an accounting device, it is harmful relationally as well.

It is perhaps awareness of this which is driving Starbucks to change their corporate accounting.  Up to now they have prioritised the relationship with their shareholders, by maximising net profits, and assumed that their rapport with customers and local communities would be unaffected.  But this no longer looks sustainable as consumers and the media join politicians in criticising the company.  Starbucks may be willing to pay some corporation tax now, but a deeper cultural change may be necessary to restore trust and respect in the other relationships on which the business depends.

Read on…
The Cambridge Paper ‘Render unto Caesar? The dilemmas of taxation policy’ offers a perspective from the Bible on taxation in the context of modern democracies.  Though the statistics are dated the principles aren’t; read the paper here.

Walk the talk
Tax avoidance schemes won’t be an issue for most of us, but the plight of those around us who are struggling due to the recession should be.  Might you volunteer some of your time at a debt counselling centre, a foodbank or another caring initiative towards those who struggle materially or relationally?

The last word…
From the Bible, Luke chapter 20, verses 21-25: “ ‘Teacher… Is it right for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?’  Jesus saw through their duplicity and said to them, ‘Show me a denarius. Whose portrait and inscription are on it?’
‘Caesar’s,’ they replied. He said to them, ‘Then give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.’

Friday 30 November 2012

Confessions of a whistle-blower



Quote
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”  Attributed to Edmund Burke.

News
On Monday Tyler Hamilton, a gold medal winner in cycling at the Athens Olympics, won this year’s William Hill Sports Book of the Year award.  ‘The Secret Race’ is a detailed exposé of the culture of doping in world class cycling. 

Hamilton explained what made him a whistle-blower:Last summer, I received a subpoena to testify before a grand jury. Until the moment I walked into the courtroom, I hadn't told a soul. My testimony went on for six hours… I told the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. And I felt a sense of relief I'd never felt before -- all the secrets, all the weight I'd been carrying around for years suddenly lifted.”  As a part of coming clean, he gave back his Olympic medal.

Although Hamilton’s confession has helped turn the tide in cleaning up cycling, many are waiting for Lance Armstrong to own up as well – the seven times Tour de France winner who has recently been stripped of all his trophies since 1998, for persistent drug abuse. 

The appeal of watching great athletes is sharing in the sense of joy and triumph that someone essentially like us has achieved great feats of strength, perseverance and skill.  This makes them heroes, people we can emulate.  But when it transpires that an athlete’s triumph was partly due to taking illegal drugs, all that good starts to unravel.

Sanctions and punishments for drug offences can only go so far to restore the sport’s reputation.  The loss of trust between athletes and the media, the disillusionment of sponsors and sense of betrayal by cycling fans cannot be repaired easily – nor the bitter hostility between the whistle-blowers and those they expose.    

Repairing the relational damage caused by years of systematic cheating and lying takes relational courage and honesty, of the kind that Hamilton has demonstrated.  May his example help others speak out the truth also, and rebuild the trust which every sport depends on.

Read on...
A recent report in the Financial Times describes the emergence of a ‘Whistle-blowers Club’ of people who have had the determination to tell the truth about some wrongdoing they had witnessed at work, and the consequences of their actions.  Read the fascinating article here.  

Walk the talk
Is your conscience uneasy about some practice at work or at home which has become normalised? IF so, what would it take for you to stand against it?

The last word
From the Bible, Psalm 32, verses 3, 5: ‘When I kept silent, my bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Then I acknowledged my sin to you and did not cover up my iniquity.  I said, “I will confess my transgressions to the Lord.”  And you forgave the guilt of my sin.’

Friday 23 November 2012

Which way to well-being?



Quote
 “…the Gross National Product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures… everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.”  Senator Robert Kennedy.

News
Can people’s happiness increase when their economic fortunes are declining?   That is one conclusion from the first report of the UK National Well-being Programme published this week.  The government initiative was launched in 2010 to understand and monitor well-being as an alternative measure of national progress, but critics say the report just states the obvious. 
However, does the unexpected correlation between falling GDP and rising well-being call into question the methodology of the programme?  Or is it another indicator that GDP is a poor overall measure of national progress?  From a relational perspective, although financial difficulties put pressure on relationships (e.g. money is the primary cause of domestic arguments), it’s also true that facing hardships together often strengthens relationships in the family and community. 
Interestingly, the region with the highest subjective measure of well-being was the Scottish Islands, where close-knit communities, family stability, a beautiful environment and low crime rates all contribute to the happiness of the population (despite the awful weather!)
Understanding these, and other non-economic factors that influence well-being, is perhaps more important now than ever, as the UK economy is likely to stagnate for a number of years.  If the government can no longer rely on steady economic growth and higher tax revenues to pay for improving the quality of national life, then perhaps it’s time for a new focus for public policy? 
Could the way forward be to encourage more investment in family, community and organisational relationships – which cost time rather than money – and holds out the promise of measurable growth in national well-being even in times of austerity?

Read on…
The Relationships Foundation published a UK Family Pressure Gauge report, highlighting some of the main relational pressures faced by families in Britain.  Read it here.
 
Walk the talk
In thinking about your Christmas holiday activities, why not plan in a day which doesn’t involve spending any money at all, and see how much well-being it generates compared to the ones depending on the wallet.

The last word
From the Bible, 1 Timothy 6, v.6-8: “But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it. But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that.”

Friday 9 November 2012

Planting more democracy



Quote
“Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote.”  George Jean Nathan

News
Next Thursday a new election takes place in England and Wales – for Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs).  The government wants to make police more accountable to their local communities, by replacing the unelected and invisible police authorities with a single commissioner for each of 41 police forces. 

However the government has come under criticism for failing to convince voters of the need for the change.  Also no money has been made available for candidates to present their case, which means the people who come and vote (it’s predicted to be a low turnout) don’t have much to go on in deciding the most appropriate person.

Government ministers argue that democracy is good per se, and that local people voting must be a better way than making the appointments centrally.  But is it? 

Democracy is about people choosing someone they know is trustworthy and competent, to assume some public responsibility.  It is inherently relational.  Trust develops best when there is real encounter between people, built up over time, accompanied by mutual knowledge and respect, and shared goals and values.

Most voters have never heard of their candidates for PCC; with so little information available, it’s hard to form an opinion as to who would be trustworthy.  Effective local democracy requires more than a decision from Whitehall to hold an election.  Local government in Britain has few powers and responsibilities that require meaningful engagement by local residents; this leaves thin relational soil for local democracy to take root.

Read on…
The R Factor was a landmark book published nearly 20 years ago about relationships in public life. In the first chapter, Michael Schluter and David Lee explained the crucial difference between encounter and contingent relationships. Read the excerpt here.

Walk the talk
For those of you based in Britain and eligible to vote in the PCC elections, why not look up your candidates (if you haven't done so) here.   Why not try to find out more about them online, see if they are going to hold any public meeting before the election, or phone them if they have given a number.  As you do so, which candidate seems the most trustworthy and competent?

The last word
From the Bible, Deuteronomy 1, verse 12-13: "But how can I bear your problems and your burdens and your disputes all by myself? Choose some wise, understanding and respected men from each of your tribes, and I will set them over you."